Former Apple engineer claims idea for Qualcomm patent, does not seek inventor status Former Apple engineer claims thought for Qualcomm patent, doesn’t search inventor standing Former Apple engineer Arjuna Siva testified on Monday within the ongoing Qualcomm v. Apple patent trial, saying he got here up with the thought for a Qualcomm patent-in-suit.

iPhone 8 Plus

Siva described a system boot-related patent as “my thought,” in line with CNET. The engineer, now an worker of Google, added that he was “stunned” and “upset” when he realized Qualcomm had filed a patent software primarily based on his enter.

Apple argues that Siva ought to be named a co-inventor of U.S. Patent No. 8,838,949. Following Siva’s testimony, attorneys for the corporate referred to as U.C. San Diego professor Invoice Lin to the stand, who backed that place.

Siva was a reluctant witness for the protection. On Thursday he out of the blue dropped out of Apple’s lineup, which prompted a disagreement with Qualcomm. One Apple lawyer accused Qualcomm of witness tampering, even claiming she would not attempt to deliver Siva again since he was a “tainted witness.” That angered the lead lawyer for Qualcomm, who referred to as the accusation a “private assault.”

Apple shortly backtracked, although, subpoenaing Siva to share testimony in court docket.

Requested why he remembers dealings courting again to 2010, when Apple was working with Qualcomm to deliver the corporate’s modems to iPhone, Siva mentioned he was “proud” that his thought made it right into a transport product.

“It is one thing I actually keep in mind, and look again with fondness,” Siva mentioned. “I used to be a child two and a half years out of school. I assumed it was a reasonably large deal for me.”

All three patents within the case are power-related, the opposite two involving graphics processing and transferring knowledge between a CPU and a modem.

Qualcomm is searching for about $31 million in damages, primarily based on a price of $1.40 per infringing machine. Particularly the chipmaker is focusing on iPhones with Intel modems — Apple started migrating away from Qualcomm as soon as an exclusivity deal led to 2016.

A professional-Qualcomm ruling might influence different ongoing circumstances, such because the lawsuit Apple launched in January 2017, lastly set to go to trial subsequent month. Apple accused Qualcomm of withholding almost $1 billion in rebates as retaliation for cooperating with antitrust investigators, and decried its enterprise practices typically. The chipmaker is thought to strain elements patrons into signing patent licenses on the similar time.

That was just the start of a spread of fits and countersuits, in addition to authorities investigations of Qualcomm, in some circumstances leading to hundreds of thousands of {dollars} in fines. A trial introduced by the U.S. Federal Commerce Fee with Apple’s assist concluded in January, although a verdict has but to be revealed.


Related Posts

Leave a Reply